Most temporary matters are conducted in the judge's chambers and no witnesses testify. At a status hearing or a case management conference, the attorneys discuss pending issues and work out timetables or set future hearing dates. Why can't all of these hearings be conducted by phone? Court is expensive for clients, particularly when they need to pay their attorneys for transportation time. From my estimation, 80% of all court could be conducted by phone, with appropriate documents circulated in advance via e-mail. At the conclusion of the hearing, the judge could enter the appropriate order and send it to the attorneys. Thousands of dollars in legal fees could be saved and attorneys could be more efficient, avoiding the unnecessary busy work of getting to the courthouse and waiting around. Also, the judges would save time and be able to schedule matters around their schedules, rather than being beholden to specific motion calls. This seems like a win-win-win to me. Nothing is perfect but this is an idea worth considering.
Steven N. Peskind is an Illinois Attorney who limits his practice to matrimonial and family law. He is a member of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, the International Academy of Family Lawyers and the American College of Family Trial Lawyers. Steven Peskind has also been named the Best Lawyers 2015 Family Law "Lawyer of the Year" for Chicagoland. Mr. Peskind has published five books on family law related topics and has been elected as a Super Lawyer for the past 8 consecutive years.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Greetings,
ReplyDeleteI'm a freelance journalist for the Beacon News. I do the Blog Log each week, where we feature a blog in the Fox Valley area and the writer of the blog. Your blog caught my attention and I think it would be a great fit for the newspaper. If you're interested, I'd like to send you some questions that you can answer at your earliest convenience.
Thanks,
Joy Davis
Joydavis234@gmail.com